One – You lock the target

As cool as interceptor missile defense technology sounds I wonder if the road the program has gone down is the right one. It’s been proven that the system can work, but the reliability is of some question. Also, the threat of an incoming missile attack has been reduced greatly in the last few years thus bringing into question if the system is needed at all. I am not in favor of scrapping the program out right, but I’d like to see more positive results before a large number of these are built. I think that the airborne laser systems have a better chance of knocking a bird down but the deployment of these are more of a local determent and not a global one.
But what would happen if the system were to work without fail? If the US would pledge that it would disable any missile fired from a nation how would that change the world political climate? Would there now be a rush to secure new kinds of weapons platforms? A move to a robotic or nanotech army? Would the suicide bomber become the standard weapon of small nations?

US missile defence test flounders again

Take 0.125 mSv and Call Me in the Morning.

I remember reading about a study that had been done on people in the Ozarks who lived in areas of higher than normal radon gas. The study found that those people showed a lower than normal rate of cancer. I’m not sure if these findings are on the same level as radon is a different kind of radiation. One thing, if this does prove to be true, the believers in homeopathic medicine should be over joyed. Either way, it’s good to be a vole living near a nuclear research facility.
Radiation May Have Positive Effects On Health: Study

(Thanks to Agent Greg for this information)